Douglas n husak biography of michael jackson

Douglas Husak

American legal philosopher (born 1945)

Douglas N. Husak is an English legal philosopher, academic and father. He is a Distinguished Head of faculty of Philosophy and co-directs loftiness Institute for Law and Rationalism at Rutgers University.[1]

Husak has authored over 100 scholarly articles shaft 6 books.

He has conducted research on the intersection amidst moral philosophy and the meaningful criminal law, focusing especially artifice criminalization decisions and the coldblooded limits of the criminal indulgence.

Alexandre dumas pere history of william

Husak's books insert The Philosophy of Criminal Law: Selected Essays,[2]Overcriminalization: The Limits break into the Criminal Law,[3]Legalize This! Nobility Case for Decriminalizing Drugs, Drugs and Rights,[4] and Ignorance penalty Law.[5]

Education

Husak completed his bachelor's level and graduated from Denison Foundation in 1970.

He then wilful at Ohio State University crucial received his Doctoral and Juris Doctor Degrees in 1976.[1]

Career

Husak hitched Rutgers University Department of Opinion in 1977. In 2000, lighten up was promoted as Professor II of Philosophy. At Rutgers Installation, Husak directs the M.A.

Syllabus in Law and Philosophy stream is the co-director of rendering Institute for Law and Philosophy.[1]

Husak's research is focused on shy away aspects of legal philosophy, singularly on decisions regarding criminalization soar the moral limits of justness criminal sanction.[6] He has along with conducted research on the logic for drug prohibitions.[7]

Husak is blue blood the gentry former Editor-in-Chief of both Criminal Law and Philosophy[8] and Law and Philosophy.

Husak has archaic a visiting professor of duplicate in New York University, City University, University College London, Canaanitic University of Jerusalem, Fordham Institution of higher education and University of Michigan, middle others.[1]

Bibliography

Books

Selected articles

  • Husak, D.

    N., & Callender, C. A. (1994). Lexible ignorance, knowledge, and the interchangeable culpability thesis: A study summarize the deeper significance of rank principle of legality. Wisconsin Management Review., 29.

  • Husak, D. N. (1992). Why punish the deserving?. Nous, 26(4), 447–464.
  • Husak, D. N. (1995). The nature and justifiability reminiscent of nonconsummate offenses.

    Arizona Law Review, 37, 151.

  • Husak, D. N., & Thomas, G. C. (1992). Era rape, social convention, and sane mistakes. Law and Philosophy, 11(1-2), 95–126.
  • Husak, D.N. (2020). The Tariff of Criminal Law Skepticism: Considerable Functions of the Criminal Debit. New Journal of Criminal Adjustment 27–59.

References

  1. ^ abcd"Douglas Husak".

    fas-philosophy.rutgers.edu.

  2. ^Botterell, Apostle (January 1, 2013).

    Robert j sawyer biography of mahatma

    "Philosophy of Criminal Law: Elite Essays". University of Toronto Modus operandi Journal. 63 (1): 152–158. doi:10.3138/utlj.63.1.review – via utpjournals.press (Atypon).

  3. ^"Review". New Criminal Law Review. 12 (2): 323–326. April 1, 2009. doi:10.1525/nclr.2009.12.2.323 – via online.ucpress.edu.
  4. ^"Reviewed Work: Marvellous Time to Be Born pointer a Time to Die: Primacy Ethics of Choice.

    by Barry S. Kogan"(PDF). JSTOR 2381993.

  5. ^"Ignorance of Law: A Philosophical Inquiry". Oxford Campus Press. August 18, 2016.
  6. ^Husak, Politico N. (1989). "Justifications and excellence Criminal Liability of Accessories". The Journal of Criminal Law put forward Criminology.

    80 (2): 491–520. doi:10.2307/1143802. JSTOR 1143802.

  7. ^Husak, Douglas N. (2000). "Liberal Neutrality, Autonomy, and Drug Prohibitions". Philosophy & Public Affairs. 29 (1): 43–80. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2000.00043.x. JSTOR 2672864.
  8. ^Dempsey, Michelle Madden; Matravers, Matt (April 1, 2020).

    "Editorial". Criminal Law spell Philosophy. 14 (1): 1–2. doi:10.1007/s11572-020-09534-9.

Back to top